Journal Information

Article Information


Comparative Study on pH-Dependent Photocatalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol using ZnO-Based Photocatalyst


Abstract

The photo-Fenton-like degradation of pollutants is dependent on the pH of solution. Here, we synthesized pristine ZnO nanorods, silver nanoparticle (AgNPs), and Ag-decorated ZnO (Ag/ZnO) composites. These materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and UV-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy. Their catalytic activities were evaluated for the photo-Fenton-like degradation of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) under visible-light irradiation at pH 4 and 7. Pristine ZnO nanorods exhibited higher catalytic activity than the Ag/ZnO composite at pH 4, while this trend reversed at pH 7. This pH-dependent reversal is attributed to the interplay between the catalyst's surface charge and the speciation of 4-NP into its phenolate form. These findings demonstrate that the key factor for enhanced photocatalytic performance is not the noble metal decoration itself, but rather the interfacial charge and dominant reactive species.


Expand AllCollapse All

INTRODUCTION

Nitrophenolic compounds are a prominent class of environmental pollutants. They are widely discharged from the pesticide, pharmaceutical, and dye manufacturing industries.1,2 Among these, 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) has been classified as a priority pollutant by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency due to its high toxicity, carcinogenicity, and persistence in aquatic ecosystems. Thus, it is essential to develop effective remediation technologies.

Degradation strategies for 4-NP involve either its reduction to 4-aminophenol or its complete mineralization via advanced oxidation processes. One of the principal advanced oxidation processes is the homogeneous Fenton reaction, which utilizes hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ferrous ions(Fe2+) to generate hydroxyl radicals (·OH). This reaction is summarized by the equation:

(1)
Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + ·OH + OH

(2)
Fe3+ + H2O2 → Fe2+ + ·OOH + H+

(3)
2H2O2 → ·OH + ·OOH + H2O

The resulting hydroxyl radicals can non-selectively degrade a wide range of persistent organic pollutants, including 4-NP. However, the practical application of this process is hindered by the generation of iron sludge, a narrow operational pH range, and inefficient Fe3+/Fe2+ cycling.3

To overcome these limitations, heterogeneous Fenton-like catalysts, such as ZnO, have been investigated. In this system, the reaction occurs on the surface of the ZnO catalyst, which mitigates sludge formation and expands the operational pH window.4,5

The mechanism involves the adsorption of iron ions onto the ZnO surface, followed by the surface-mediated generation of radicals. As a semiconductor, ZnO can also facilitate the continuous regeneration of the active Fe2+ species from Fe3+ using photogenerated electrons (e), thus overcoming a key drawback of the homogeneous process. The key steps on the ZnO surface can be described as follows:

  • 1. Adsorption and Reduction: ZnO + Fe3+ + e → ZnO-Fe2+

  • 2. Surface Fenton Reaction: ZnO-Fe2+ + H2O2 → ZnO-Fe3+ + ·OH + OH

This surface-based catalytic cycle enhances both the efficiency and stability of the degradation process.

The catalytic activity of pristine ZnO is constrained by its wide bandgap (~3.37 eV), which limits its photoactivity to the UV region, and by the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers.6 A strategy to overcome these limitations is the decoration of the ZnO surface with noble metal nanoparticles, such as silver (Ag). The integration of Ag nanoparticles extends light absorption into the visible spectrum via localized surface plasmon resonance(LSPR) and promotes charge separation through the formation of a Schottky barrier at the Ag-ZnO interface.79 This enhanced charge separation is hypothesized to accelerate the regeneration of Fe2+ (Step 1) and the decomposition of H2O2 (Step 2), thereby improving overall catalytic activity. While the photocatalytic performance of ZnO/Ag nanocomposites has been reported, their Fenton-like activity for 4-NP degradation has not been systematically investigated.

Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of Ag nanoparticles, ZnO nanorods, and Ag-decorated ZnO nanocomposites. The Fenton-like catalytic activities of these materials were evaluated for 4-NP degradation in both acidic and neutral pH environments. The catalytic performance was compared among the three catalysts by analyzing their reaction kinetics. This work contributes to the rational design of next-generation heterogeneous catalysts with improved efficiency and stability for nvironmental remediation.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Materials

Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), silver nitrate (AgNO3), trisodium citrate (HOC(COONa)(CH2COONa)2·2H2O), 4-NP, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 5%), and nitric acid (HNO3, 1 M) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received without further purification. Deionized (DI) water was used throughout all experiments.

Synthesis of Ag Nanoparticles

Ag nanoparticles were synthesized via the citrate reduction method.10 70.0 mg of AgNO3 was dissolved in 400 mL of DI water and heated to boiling up to 100 °C. Subsequently, 8.0 mL of a 1% (w/w) trisodium citrate solution was rapidly introduced under vigorous stirring, and the mixture was maintained at 100 °C for 30 min. The resulting colloidal solution was cooled to room temperature and purified by centrifugation (8,000 rpm, 10 min, repeated three times) followed by redispersion in DI water. The purified Ag nanoparticles were concentrated to a final volume of 3 mL and stored at 4 °C.

Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles

ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized using a hydrothermal approach.11 An aqueous NaOH solution (2.67 g in 16 mL DI water) was added dropwise to a stirred zinc acetate solution (1.73 g in 133 mL DI water). The resulting suspension was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 12 h. After cooling to room temperature, the white precipitate was collected by centrifugation (5,000 rpm, 10 min), washed twice each with DI water and ethanol, and dried in an oven at 50 °C for 12 h.

Synthesis of ZnO/Ag Composites

ZnO/Ag composites were synthesized via a hydrothermal method.11 Zinc acetate dihydrate (0.416 g in 32 mL DI water) was dissolved under stirring, followed by the sequential addition of 4 mL NaOH (4 M) and 10 mL AgNO3 (5 wt%). The reaction mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and maintained at 180 °C for 12 h. The resulting precipitate was separated by centrifugation (5,000 rpm, 10 min), washed twice with DI water and ethanol, and dried at 50 °C for 12 h.

Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized catalysts was evaluated by monitoring the degradation of 4-NP under white light irradiation. For the solid catalysts, 20 mg of either ZnO or ZnO/Ag was dispersed in 100 mL of a 10 mg/L 4-NP aqueous solution. In the case of Ag nanoparticle catalyst, 1 mL of Ag nanoparticle solution was added to 100 mL of the 4-NP solution. To this suspension, 1 mL of 5% H2O2 was added, and the pH was subsequently adjusted to either neutral or acidic. For the acidic condition, the pH was set to 4 using 1 M HNO3 (200 mL). The mixture was then stirred in the dark for 90 min to establish adsorption–desorption equilibrium. Subsequently, the suspension was irradiated under a white-light lamp (solar simulator, 66902, Newport; equipped with a 300 W Xe arc lamp and a 420 nm long pass filter) with continuous stirring for 180 min. Throughout the entire process, at predetermined time intervals (0, 30, 60, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165, and 180 min), 1 mL aliquots were withdrawn and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 1 min). The concentration of 4-NP in the resulting supernatant was then determined by measuring its characteristic absorbance at 400 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2600i, Shimadzu).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The surface morphologies of the samples were characterized by high-resolution SEM, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1a reveals that the sample consists of densely packed spherical Ag nanoparticles. The particle size analysis (inset) indicates an average diameter of approximately 45 nm, showing a tendency toward aggregation due to homogeneous nucleation. The ZnO nanorods sample (Figure 1b) is composed of discrete, uniform, pencil-like nanorods. The Ag/ZnO nanocomposite (Figure 1c) shows that the Ag nanoparticles are well-distributed on the surfaces of the ZnO nanorods. Notably, these decorated Ag nanoparticles were found to be significantly smaller, with an average diameter of 20 nm, compared to the pure Ag nanoparticles. This observation confirms the successful formation of each nanostructure.

Figure1.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) Ag nanoparticles, (b) ZnO nanorods, and (c) the AgNP/ZnO nanocomposite. The insets in (a) and (c) display the corresponding particle size distribution histograms with Gaussian fits, indicating average Ag particle diameters of approximately 45 nm and 20 nm, respectively. The scale bar represents 1 μm.

jkcs-70-9-f001.tif

The formation of Ag nanoparticles was characterized using UV-Vis spectroscopy, as shown in Figure 2. The spectrum exhibits a strong and distinct absorption band with a maximum (λmax) at ~445 nm. This characteristic band is attributed to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of the Ag nanoparticles, which originates from the collective oscillation of conduction electrons on the nanoparticle surface upon excitation by incident light. The λmax value is consistent with values reported in the literature for spherical Ag nanoparticles, confirming their successful synthesis.10

Figure2.

UV-vis absorption spectrum of the synthesized Ag nanoparticles.

jkcs-70-9-f002.tif

The crystal structure and phase purity of the synthesized materials were investigated using XRD (Figure 3). For the ZnO nanorods sample, all observed diffraction peaks (red line) can be perfectly indexed to the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO (ICSD 67849; black line). The prominent peaks located at 2θ values of 31.7°, 34.4°, 36.2°, 47.5°, and 56.6° correspond to the (100), (002), (101), (102), and (110) crystal planes of wurtzite ZnO, respectively. These sharp and narrow peaks indicate the high crystallinity of the prepared ZnO nanorods. In addition, the diffraction peaks correspond to the wurtzite ZnO phase, confirming the high phase purity of the sample without any other impurities.

Figure3.

XRD patterns of pristine ZnO nanorods (red line) and the Ag/ZnO composite (green line). Standard patterns for hexagonal wurtzite ZnO (ICSD 67849, black line) and face-centered cubic (fcc) Ag (ICSD 53761, blue line) are included for reference.

jkcs-70-9-f003.tif

In the XRD pattern of the Ag/ZnO composite (green line), all diffraction peaks corresponding to the wurtzite ZnO phase are retained, suggesting that the crystal structure of ZnO was not altered during the composite formation. In addition to the ZnO peaks, several new diffraction peaks are clearly observed at 2θ values of 38.1°, 44.3°, 64.4°, and 77.5°. These peaks are in excellent agreement with the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of the face-centered cubic (fcc) structure of metallic Ag (ICSD 53761; blue line). The presence of distinct peaks for both ZnO and Ag, without any detectable impurity phases, confirms the successful synthesis of a two-phase Ag/ZnO nanocomposite.

The photocatalytic performance of catalysts was evaluated by monitoring the degradation of 4-NP under UV irradiation using time-resolved UV–Vis spectroscopy. Prior to illumination, all solutions containing the catalyst were stirred in the dark for 90 min to establish adsorption–desorption equilibrium, and the concentration after this dark period was defined as C0. The time-dependent absorption spectra (Figure 4a–f) reveal the progressive degradation of 4-NP over the UV irradiation. The initial spectra show clear pH-dependent differences arising from the acid-base equilibrium of 4-NP. At pH 4, 4-NP exists mainly in its neutral protonated form and displays an absorption maximum at 317 nm. At pH 7, it is largely deprotonated to the 4-nitrophenolate anion, which exhibits a strong band at 400 nm. These two bands correspond to protonated 4-NP and the deprotonated 4-nitrophenolate ion, respectively.12 Upon interaction with the catalysts, particularly ZnO and Ag/ZnO (at pH 4 and 7), and Ag nanoparticles (at pH 7), the primary absorption band of 4-NP shifts from approximately 317 nm to around 400 nm. However, this shift was negligible for Ag nanoparticles at pH 4. This shift provides spectroscopic evidence for the formation of the deprotonated 4-nitrophenolate species and its subsequent adsorption onto the catalyst surface. As the reaction proceeds, the intensity of the relevant absorption bands decreases for all samples. This decrease is consistent with the visual fading of the solution's yellow color (inset images).

Figure4.

(a–f) Time-dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-NP under UV irradiation at pH 4 (a-c) and pH 7 (d-f) using Ag nanoparticles, ZnO, and Ag/ZnO catalysts. Before irradiation, each suspension was stirred in the dark for 90 min to reach adsorption–desorption equilibrium (C0). Insets show photographs of the reaction solutions over time. (g) Normalized concentration (C/C0) versus irradiation time. (h) Corresponding pseudo-first-order kinetic plots.

jkcs-70-9-f004.tif

To elucidate the degradation kinetics, the C/C₀ versus time plots and corresponding pseudo-first-order kinetic fits (ln(C/C₀) versus time) are presented in Figure 4g and 4h, respectively. The linear correlation for all catalysts confirms that the degradation follows pseudo-first-order kinetics. Catalytic activity was pH-dependent. Under pH 4, pristine ZnO exhibited superior activity (k = 0.00792 min-1) over the Ag/ZnO composite (k = 0.00433 min-1). Conversely, at pH 7, the Ag/ZnO composite showed the highest rate constant (k = 0.00579 min-1). This pH-dependent reversal in catalytic performance is attributed to the electrostatic interplay between the catalyst surface charge and the ionization state of the reactant. Physicochemical data supports this mechanism: ZnO possesses a point of zero charge (PZC) in the range of approximately 8.7–10.3,13 meaning that its surface remains a net positive charge (ZnO–H⁺) under both pH 4 and 7. Simultaneously, given its pKa of 7.16, 4-NP transitions from its neutral form at pH 4 to the negatively charged 4-nitrophenolate anion near pH 7. Consequently, at pH 7, a strong electrostatic attraction forms between the positively charged ZnO surface and the anionic phenolate species, enhancing their local concentration near the catalyst surface. For the Ag/ZnO composite, the presence of Ag nanoparticles further facilitates electron trapping and charge separation across the ZnO/Ag heterojunction, thereby accelerating the degradation process at this optimized pH. At pH 4, however, electrostatic interactions are minimal because the 4-NP molecules remain neutral.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a pH-dependent reversal in photocatalytic performance: pristine ZnO showed superior 4-NP degradation at pH 4, while Ag/ZnO excelled at pH 7. This demonstrates that noble metal decoration does not universally enhance photocatalytic activity but depends critically on surface electrostatics, substrate speciation, and reaction conditions. Rational catalyst design must therefore adopt a holistic approach that optimizes the entire catalytic system rather than focusing solely on material composition. These findings provide valuable guidance for developing pH-responsive photocatalysts for environmental remediation.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE) program through the Jeonbuk RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Jeonbuk State, Republic of Korea (2025-RISE-13-KSU).

References

1. 

A. O. Cardoso Juarez E. Ivan Ocampo Lopez M. K. Kesarla N. K. R. Bogireddy ACS Omega2024933335 [CrossRef]

2. 

J. C. Spain Annu. Rev. Microbiol.199549523 [CrossRef]

3. 

J. Kiwi C. Pulgarin P Peringer Appl. Catal. B: Environmental19943335 [CrossRef]

4. 

E. H. Umukoro M. G. Peleyeju A. O. Idris J. C. Ngila N. Mabuba L. Rhyman P. Ramasami O. A. Arotiba Photoelectrocatalytic RSC Adv.2018810255 [CrossRef]

5. 

I. T. Peternel N. Koprivanac A. M. L. Božić H. M. J. Kušić Hazard. Mater.2007148477 [CrossRef]

6. 

N. Kamarulzaman M. F. Kasim R. Rusdi Nanoscale Res. Lett.201510346 [CrossRef]

7. 

Ö. A. Yıldırım H. E. Unalan C. J. Durucan Am. Ceram. Soc.201396766 [CrossRef]

8. 

P.-S. Huang F. Qin J.-K. Lee ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2020124715 [CrossRef]

9. 

P. Fageria S. Gangopadhyay S. Pande RSC Adv.2014424962 [CrossRef]

10. 

J. A. Creighton C. G. Blatchford M. G. J. Albrecht Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.1979275790 [CrossRef]

11. 

Y. Wei X. Wang G. Yi L. Zhou J. Cao G. Sun Z. Chen H. Bala Z. Zhang Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc.201875327 [CrossRef]

12. 

A. K. Samuel Z. Ertekin B. Moses Abraham Z. Yang M. D. Symes A. Y. Ganin Dalton Trans.2025

13. 

X. Wang T. Sun H. Zhu T. Han J. Wang H. J. Dai Environ. Manag.2020267110656